Legislature(2007 - 2008)BELTZ 211
03/20/2008 09:00 AM Senate STATE AFFAIRS
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
SB198 | |
SB199 | |
SCR12|| SB203 | |
SB213 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
*+ | SB 198 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | SB 203 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | SCR 12 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | SB 199 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | SB 213 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED |
SB 198-CAMPAIGN FINANCE/ELECTION CODE VIOLATIONS 9:07:52 AM CHAIR MCGUIRE announced the consideration of SB 198. SENATOR BILL WIELECHOWSKI, Alaska State Legislature, said SB 198 is based on recommendations by the Alaska Public Offices Commission (APOC) to restore the statute of limitations to four years for investigating and prosecuting violations of state campaign finance reforms. Alaska has only a single year now. Most states allow for more time for violations to come to light and be investigated. Georgia allows three to five years. Washington and California allow complaints to be filed within four years. Connecticut, Massachusetts, Hawaii, and New Jersey, have no time limits. Several states extend their statutes for fraud and misrepresentation for one year from the date of discovery. At the unanimous urging from APOC, SB 198 would reinstate the four-year statute of limitations that existed until 2003, providing sufficient time for a violation to be discovered and investigated. The bill will restrict post- election fundraising to ten days after an election. It also limits surplus campaign funds that can be given to a political party to $5,000, in conformity with AS15.030.70, which limits individual donations to political parties. At the recommendation of the APOC commissioners, SB 198 will also increase the civil penalty for lobbyists who don't file required reports with the commission from $10 to $50 per day. It has not been increased since 1976, and APOC is concerned that it is not substantial enough to encourage timely filing. 9:10:31 AM CHAIR MCGUIRE asked why 10 days instead of 45 for fundraising. SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI said it was a recommendation by APOC, and the fundamental idea is that once someone wins an election he or she shouldn't fundraise. SENATOR STEVENS asked if this has been a problem. SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI said he is willing to take that provision out. CHAIR MCGUIRE suggested that an underdog may win and then wants an opportunity to recover costs. SENATOR BUNDE said it seems that some losers of federal campaigns have fundraisers to recoup personal funds. He understands that ten days may include money in the mail. But a winner may be able to lean on people and there may be more pressure than from a loser's fundraising activities. 9:13:00 AM CHRIS ELLINGSON, Acting Executive Director, Alaska Public Offices Commission, said the rationale for the ten days is based on what has been happening since campaign finance reform. The winners usually get most of the money before and after the election. There seems to be a run of post-election fundraising to recoup some personal money and to pay off debts, but much of it is used to give away to others. APOC has looked at where this money is going. Some goes to charities that had a close relationship with the winner and some goes to the political party. APOC is considering reinstating the ten-day post-election report and changing the year-end report due date to December 31, which makes more sense. "That's why they were looking at the ten-day time frame. They were not wedded to it and if it is a problem, I'm sure that they would understand if it came out." 9:15:19 AM SENATOR BUNDE said he supports limiting "the notion of harvesting money and then turning it around and passing it on to parties and charities and that sort of thing." The bill also contains a $5,000 maximum contribution, and he asked if that would address those concerns. "The other thing is if it was limited to only people who lost the election, would that help? Because … someone that has won the election and then has a fundraiser … people may feel pressured to attend that." MS. ELLINGSON said the $5,000 would make a big difference. If that stays in, APOC would have no problem with the time period th being up to the 45 day. Of importance is that the people who run and win are the ones who can have a fundraiser. A fundraiser for a loser doesn't really happen. 9:17:18 AM SENATOR STEVENS asked if the money is really a problem. He would be lucky to have money left over after an election. How often has over $5,000 been given to a political party? MS. ELLINGSON said quite often because of the limits of rolling money forward to a new campaign. She has seen anywhere from $10,000 to $20,000, and it doesn't necessarily go to the central committee, it may go to different arms of the committees. SENATOR STEVENS said he wants some facts before he would agree. MS. ELLINGSON said she can get it to him, but there are between five and six candidates that distribute that much to parties after every election campaign. It is part of the disbursement process after the election is over. 9:19:02 AM SENATOR FRENCH asked if a person could donate $5,000 to the Republican Party and then give more to a subdivision of the party, like a candidate's fund. Will it all count toward the limit? MS. ELLINGSON said yes. Everyone else in the state who wants to contribute to the party can only give $5,000, so why shouldn't a candidate have the same limit? SENATOR FRENCH asked if this bill will make $5,000 the total limit and not allow giving $5,000 to different subdivisions. 9:20:37 AM MS. ELLINGSON said it will bring it in line with every other person that contributes. That is the total maximum. SENATOR STEVENS asked if this is abused by both parties. MS. ELLINGSON said, absolutely. SENATOR BUNDE asked how often the lobbyist fine is imposed now, and how many days are they usually in arrears. MS. ELLINGSON said at every APOC meeting there are five to fifteen lobbyists up for civil penalty review because they want to appeal them. Lobbyists have paid up to $7,000 at $10 per day. SENATOR BUNDE asked if they are accessed the penalty when they are under appeal. MS. ELLINGSON said lobbyists have to file a report and then they are assessed a penalty. The clock stops the day the report is filed. They can appeal it once they get the penalty letter. SENATOR STEVENS said a $7,000 fine could go up to $35,000. MS. ELLINGSON agreed. 9:23:20 AM SENATOR STEVENS said he is not a great friend of lobbyists but the fine sounds high, but they do earn lots of money. He has a problem with the ten days and the $5,000. He wants to know why it is so bad that the parties receive funds and disburse them to the candidates. What is so bad about the current system? SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI said Ms. Ellingson had compelling testimony. APOC is unanimous on it. If a lobbyist is getting fined $7,000 it means reports haven't been filed for over two years, and Ms. Ellingson said there were five to fifteen lobbyists per APOC meeting. It is a problem, and if the fine is increased it might solve it. The fine is so small lobbyists decide to pay the fine instead of disclosing information. 9:26:09 AM SENATOR BUNDE said he understands the logic of not letting a candidate donate more than anyone else. He supports the $5,000 limit. The ten-day timeframe wasn't as important to APOC. He heard Ms. Ellingson say there were ten to fifteen lobbyists appealing, not in arrears. A person files, meets the deadline, and then argues about it afterwards. He doesn't understand why a lobbyist wouldn't file on a timely basis, so he is not concerned about the $50 a day. He doesn't understand why a winner "should be able to do the 45 days. I don't know if we want to be creative and say losers get 45 days and winners get 10." Maybe it isn't worth the effort because not many people go to a loser's fundraiser. There may be people who run with the idea of recouping some of their losses after the election. He asked Ms. Ellingson about differentiating between winners and losers. 9:28:22 AM MS. ELLINGSON said it would be doable but prefers keeping it equal across the board. APOC is not wedded to the ten-day limit. CHAIR MCGUIRE said if candidates are doing what they should be doing, they are out knocking on doors and campaigning. Fundraising is a burden, but the money helps get the message out. She raises money after the deadline because she has no time during the election. She doesn't raise money to give to a party. SENATOR FRENCH said the heart of this proposal is extending the statute of limitations. This is what the public wants. The bill has a long way to go, and he wants the committee to agree to let that provision go forward today. A one-year statute of limitation on campaign violations is insufficient given the meager resources of APOC. He wants to rally around that part of the bill. He doesn't know how much of a problem post-election fundraising is, but APOC thinks it is a problem. There should be some time limit on fundraising. He has seen some losers hold fundraisers, and maybe they are being encouraged to run again. "I've had to come deeply out of pocket to get through an election cycle, and so you try to get some of that back." He suggested changing the limit to 30 days, keeping the statute of limitations, and moving the bill. 9:32:05 AM SENATOR BUNDE said there is another bill that addresses only the four-year statute of limitations. This bill could be set aside. CHAIR MCGUIRE said she would like to let both bills move through the process. Thirty days seems like a compromise. SENATOR FRENCH moved conceptual Amendment 1, as follows: On page 2, line 8: Delete "ten" Insert "thirty" Hearing no objection, conceptual Amendment 1 passed. CHAIR MCGUIRE said she would like to hear how that plays out, and maybe with the limitation on the party donation, it will take care of the problem. SENATOR STEVENS said he wants to know the reason for the $5,000. He gets money from the Republican Party. He has never returned any to it, but it may be a good idea to return money to those coffers. What is wrong with it? 9:34:11 AM SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI said APOC unanimously supported these changes, and it puts everyone in line with what any other individual in the state can donate. The meat of the bill is the statute of limitation. If the committee is concerned, perhaps it can be taken up at another time. SENATOR STEVENS said APOC has not presented a compelling argument. There is nothing wrong with returning funds to the party that supported him. He also questioned the 30-day limit. SENATOR FRENCH said there should be some limit, and 30 days is enough time to wrap up a campaign and settle the debts. He is not sure any abuses have been centered on settling campaign accounts. He wouldn't oppose an amendment to strike Section 3. SENATOR BUNDE objected. This is a package of recommendations from APOC and the committee is dissecting and picking among them. "If you want a clean bill, we've got one." CHAIR MCGUIRE said she will oppose the amendment because she can see where a party is using candidates - who are propped up by the party -- to regenerate funds. It is outside the regular method for raising money for the party. 9:37:09 AM SENATOR FRENCH he said he wouldn't oppose a motion, but did not move an amendment. CHAIR MCGUIRE said Senator Stevens has made good points, and perhaps between now and the next committee, he can get more information. SENATOR FRENCH moved to report SB 198, as amended, from committee with individual recommendations and attached fiscal note(s). SENATOR BUNDE objected. There are two bills with the core provision, and this is more complicated. SB 198 shouldn't move out of committee when there are a lot of questions. "We should work on this bill, and I think these $5,000 questions are important ones. Let the clean bill move forward, and we can let this one catch up after we get our questions answered." 9:39:14 AM CHAIR MCGUIRE said she doesn't want politics to get in the way of what seems to be a good idea. "Good enough that you have two members out of 20 that have put it forward." She wants to put them both forward and see which one moves ahead. A roll call vote was taken. Senators French and McGuire voted in favor of moving SB 198 from committee, and Senators Bunde and Stevens voted against. The bill failed to move out of committee on a vote of 2 to 2.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|